An Open Letter To President Obama On Health Care Reform And What It Means To My Family

An Open Letter To President Obama On Health Care Reform And What It Means To My Family

Mr. President:
I know that you are a very busy man so I will try to keep my questions about health care reform and the recently passed legislation as short and simple as possible.
- I could ask you why you fancy this is a good piece of legislation even though I truly rest assured that it will be a mistake and will come very close to bankrupting the country. The basis for my conclusion has void to do with political nepotism ( in fact, I have never voted for a Republican for national office in my life. ) From my perspective, " Obama Care " never effectively addressed the root causes of our escalating health care costs: Americans eat too much of the amiss kinds of food, they exercise far too little, they are chubby, they smoke too much, and they are getting older. This legislation does not directions these causes, it just raises taxes and moves money around within the bureaucracy. I could ask you about this but I will not.
- I could ask you why you have not stepped forward and denounced those in your party that have likened Americans congeneric myself, i. e. those that have legitimate and honest concerns about this health care reform bill, to the racists who fought against the civil rights movement from the 1960s. I thought that we lived in a free country where humankind could freely label their elected representatives without being slurred in the most debasing way possible, just for having a different theorem. Your deficiency of righteousness to oppose those Democrats who frequently use the term " racist " to calumniate myself and those Americans heavy their honest opposition, cheapens the honour and contributions of those from long ago that fought actual racism. I could ask you about this but I will not.
- I could ask you why you felt it vital to pass this legislation by the back door called reconciliation. This is a major, major nut in the country that will affect every American for decades to come. Offensive it in the back door, without using the regular, time gratifying tack of passing laws in his country, belittles the approach and makes it view not unlike it was forced through without the full weight of the democratic process behind it. I could ask you about this but I will not.
Here is what I will ask you about. But first, some skill facts:
- Let me reiterate that both my wife and myself have never voted for a Republican for national office in our lives.
- We both spent several decades of our lives working tough for AT&T, blushing several years ago, secure in our thinking that AT&T ' s promise of health care benefits and coverage for our long years of service was a good bet.
- We both try to eat well, we exercise at our local YMCA on an halfway daily basis, neither of us smoke, and we hardly drink. In other words, we take personal burden for our health and our health care.
One impetus for our personal boundness behavior is that we are on a high deductible insurance plan with AT&T. We are each under obligation for the first $1, 200 of our annual health care costs before we get any insurance coverage at all. However, for this personal fault, we also pay annihilation in annual premiums.
- During the debate leading up to the passage of health care reform, you reiterated more than once that those of us that currently had health care coverage would be able to keep it. However, in a recent article in Fortune magazine, the CEO of AT&T, Randall Stephenson, was interviewed ( several pages of the article are attached ). Towards the end of the call, he was explicitly asked whether AT&T would consider dropping health care insurance coverage for its employees and retirees. His response made it shiny that this was a very usage option for two reasons. First, from a business profitability perspective, subservient the new health care reform law, " you ' re better off paying the government a fine and dropping health care coverage for your employees ", practical AT&Ts bottom line. Second, he talks about " economic preponderance " which appears to be code words for " if others in his industry do it, AT&T will have no choice but to do it also. "
Thus, a few quick questions for you:
1 ) Were you just ingenuous when you made the comments that we could all keep our current health care insurance, not contemplation the simple actuality that companies are in business to make money and if this bill makes it easier for them to make more money by not insuring their workforce, that is what they will do? Or were you being disingenuous, knowing that this would happen and deliberately misinforming the country to help get your health care reform bill passed? Unworldly or disingenuous, in either case you will be making millions of American voters crummy in November and in 2012 when we are forced out of our current health care coverage and will blame you for either youth or arrogance in this setting.
2 ) I am 57 years elderly and my wife is 56 years senile and if Mr. Stephenson does decide to abolish AT&T ' s health care coverage for employees and retirees, where do you prompt that my wife and I get coverage? What insurance company is proposition to want to aggregate us up, and millions of other older Americans who kiss goodbye their coverage, at our ages even though we are both healthy and taking personal guilt for our gangling good health?
3 ) If we are forced out onto the market for health care insurance coverage, our new coverage is likely activity to be much more of value. Our annual health care costs will go from a maximum of $1, 200 each to a minimum of several thousand dollars each. Is this how you unborn to reduce health care costs for middle class America? Is so, then you need to explicate the math to me. Maximum of $1, 200 to a minimum of several thousand dollars, does not make bent out here in the real world. How does this reduce the escalating health care costs for the 90 % of Americans that even now had health care insurance prior to the aisle of this bill?
Thus, I am not dash to ask you about why you and the keep up of Congress did not address the root causes of high health care costs in your legislating process. I am not vigor to ask why you have sat back and been silent while those Americans with legitimate and honest dissent against this bill have been likened to racists by members of your party. I thought you represented all Americans, not just those that agreed with your policies. I will not ask you about why you did not have the courage and salt to pass this legislation the right way, through the front door approximating every other piece of legislation, but instead snuck it through the back door of reconciliation.
However, I will ask you or your staff to contact me and account for where and how I can get health care coverage at my age if AT&T and the rest of corporate America decides it is a better economic choice to pay a government fine than to cover their employees and retirees with health insurance. I will ask you to illustrate whether you were naive or disingenuous when explaining that we would be able to keep our current health insurance coverage. And conclusively, please manifest how paying no more than $1, 200 a year beneath my current coverage ( with many years paying extinction for coverage during healthy years ) is a better deal then decision new coverage at my age and paying several thousand dollars a year for the privilege.
Although I have written to the Bloodless Co-op many times, I have never manifest any answer to my questions on a wide variety of topics even though you promised to have the most open and responsive administration of all time. That has not happened yet. However, in this case I do miss, in truth I demand specific answers to my three questions considerable. For your political welfare I hope to receive those answers before early November and certainly before 2012.
Thank you for your time,
Walter " Bruno " Korschek
[Follow up note: a month after sending this to the Ivory Cubbyhole, no answers to the questions have been well-known or even a simple scrutiny that this letter was down pat has been later from the Obama adminstration. ]

An Open Letter To President Obama - Seeking Unity But Sowing Disunity

An Open Letter To President Obama - Seeking Unity But Sowing Disunity

I commence your words on national unity, at the end of your recent speech on the Afghanistan contention, both empty and frustrating:
" This vast and varied citizenry will not always grant on every topic – nor should we. But I also know that we, as a country, cannot sustain our leadership nor navigate the thrust challenges of our time if we allow ourselves to be split asunder by the corresponding aversion and disbelief and patronage that has in recent times poisoned our national discourse.
It is easy to forget that when this contest began, we were united – bound together by the fresh reflection of a eccentric dirty deed, and by the determination to defend our homeland and the values we hold dear. I refuse to accept the concept that we cannot impart that unity further. I understand with every fiber of my being that we – as Americans – can still come together behind a common purpose. For our values are not wittily words written into parchment – they are a creed that calls us together, and that has carried us through the darkest of storms as one nation, one people. "
Here you are utopian and yearning for unity but your actions and silence broadcast disunity:
- When Americans were rising up and demanding answers to unclear health care reform issues and legislation, you condescended to those in disagreement and told them to stop " dissension ", as if they were children scrap over the last piece of cake.
- When Air Force One and an accompanying Air Force doughboy made very low flight passes over New York Vicinity, causing hysteria and bugbear in those New Yorkers on the ground who were reliving the hateful memories of the 9 - 11 attacks, you displayed an conceited insensitivity by working the incident into a pun you told several days successive at a reception.
- When Nancy Pelosi called those in disagreement with health care reform plans " un - American ", you were silent.
- When Democratic Congressman Grayson of Florida called all Republicans " knuckle dragging Neanderthals ", you were silent.
- When one of your czars, Van Jones, called all Republicans a - - h - - - s in a public forum in Berkley that was captured on videotape and YouTube, you were silent.
- When Henry Reid stated publicly that American tourists, the very taxpayers that pay Congressional salaries, physically smell when they visit the nation ' s Finance in the summer, your were silent.
- When Pelosi and Reid and a small cabal of Democrats took the health care reform legislation tug behind closed doors and into quick, no review votes, bypassing formal, meaningful, and democratic debate, you were silent.
- While you graciously and quickly accepted the discomfort of Congressman Joe Wilson who yelled out " Liar " during your health care speech to Congress, when Pelosi went for a hit of backer flesh by censuring the Congressman, you were silent.
- When ACORN came subservient the eye for voter registration and child prostitution shenanigans and harm of taxpayer money, you were silent.
National unity often manifests itself in one of two ways. First, an rousing tragedy approximating as the onslaught on Pearl Harbor or the 9 - 11 attacks can trial a sphere together. Second, a great rector such as Churchill in World Combat II or President Kennedy ' s Camelot vision can strain the citizenry together for a greater purpose. However, allowing comrade dudes to be called a - - h - - - s, un - American, smelly, knuckle dragging Neanderthals is no way to become a great officer of a unified nation. By conversation to American adults as if they were children, telling them to stop scrap when they were only freely expressive their opinions and concerns is no way to become a great head of a unified nation. Making light of American fears by telling a yarn about an incident that negatively impacted a lot of people is no way to become a great herald of a unified nation.
In less than a year you went from an lick ranking over 70 % to an catechism classifying underneath 50 %, not whereas you made difficult and chivalrous decisions but thanks to your were silent, condescending, and insensitive. Identical a high trial rating provided an unprecedented opportunity at national unity that you dream for. You disoriented that historic opportunity when you went from being the bright side for a better national future to becoming just added partisan politician close the rest of the political class in Washington. What a ignomity.